Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results
Date
Msg-id 24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Isn't the point of using ANALYZE here to show that the exec-param
>>> based run-time pruning is working (those "never executed" strings)?

>> Hm.  Well, if you want to see those, we could do it as attached.

> Perfect, thanks.

OK, pushed that way.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unstable select_parallel regression output in 12rc1