Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c
Date
Msg-id 24762.1518639935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/13/18 23:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm not seeing that.  What compiler are you using exactly?

> This warning comes from using -Og instead of -O2.
> It's the only such warning, so it would be nice to silence it, because
> using -Og is somewhat useful.

There's a different one of the eight (I forget which exactly) that is
the only warning I see when building on some BSD platforms I have laying
about.  So I think they're probably all annoying, just to different
people.  I'm inclined to pick up Jaime's patch to silence all of them.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: reorganizing partitioning code (was: Re: [HACKERS] path towardfaster partition pruning)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: reorganizing partitioning code (was: Re: [HACKERS] path towardfaster partition pruning)