Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... My own opinion is
>> that there is nothing broken there; certainly nothing so broken that
>> we need to force a change under schedule pressure.
> I don't feel we are under pressure. We have time to discuss and address
> it.
Well, it's all a matter of how you look at it. Isn't the point of your
post that began this thread to start giving people a sense of time
pressure?
I agree that if we could quickly come to a resolution about how this
ought to work, there's plenty of time to go off and implement it. But
(1) we failed to come to a consensus before, so I'm not optimistic
than one will suddenly emerge now; (2) we've got a ton of other issues
that we *need* to deal with before beta. This one does not strike me
as a must-fix, and so I'm loathe to spend much development time on it
when there are so many open issues.
regards, tom lane
