Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy
Date
Msg-id 24700.1297314229@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy  (strk <strk@keybit.net>)
Responses Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy  (strk <strk@keybit.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
strk <strk@keybit.net> writes:
> I've finally completed the debugging phase and have
> a minimal self-contained testcase showing the problem.
> It has to do with INITIALLY DEFERRED constraints.

I looked into this and find that the issue is you're trying to drop a
table that has unfired AFTER TRIGGER events pending.  When they finally
fire, they can't find the table anymore.

I'm inclined to think that we should disallow that; or even more to the
point, that it'd be a good thing to apply CheckTableNotInUse() when
about to drop a table.  If we disallow such cases for ALTER TABLE, then
a fortiori we should do so for DROP TABLE.

Aside from disallowing unfired trigger events, CheckTableNotInUse would
disallow the table being actively relation_open'd by any operation.
This seems like a real good thing anyway (imagine, eg, DROP TABLE
executed from a trigger for that table).

It's possible that we could handle the unfired-trigger problem by
marking the relevant events AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE, but I'm unconvinced that
it's worth spending effort on.  The relation_open part of it seems
essential even so; you could likely crash the backend with that.

Comments?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Typed-tables patch broke pg_upgrade
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP SCHEMA xxx CASCADE: ERROR: could not open relation with OID yyy