Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date
Msg-id 24668.1099340696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> [ proposed fix ]
> As you can see, this is quite a bit more complicated than the simple
> CreateProcess() call we have now.
> ...
> If this seems like a reasonable approach, I can see if I can get
> something together. But it's a fairly large change..

It sounds reasonable to me, in the sense that it is a localized change,
even if rather messy.  (Perhaps this chunk of code should be pushed into
src/port someplace, instead of being dropped into postmaster.c?)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE is not allowed in a non-volatile function
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item