Re: Postgres low end processing. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres low end processing.
Date
Msg-id 24646.1065195774@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres low end processing.  (Stef <svb@ucs.co.za>)
Responses Re: Postgres low end processing.  (Stef <svb@ucs.co.za>)
Re: Postgres low end processing.  (Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Stef <svb@ucs.co.za> writes:
> I've been trying to find out if some guidelines
> exist, somewhere, describing how postgres
> can possibly run on less than 8MB of RAM.

Are you sure you want Postgres, and not something smaller?  BDB,
or SQL Lite, for example?

"Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house PhD theses."
-- J. Hellerstein (who ought to know)

But having said that ... given virtual memory and cramped configuration
settings, Postgres would certainly run in an 8M machine.  Maybe "crawl"
would be a more applicable verb than "run", but you could execute it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jean-Luc Lachance
Date:
Subject: Re: count(*) slow on large tables
Next
From: Stef
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres low end processing.