Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Yep, that's fine. I believe someone said that we'd never removed one
> before, but now we should be careful not to reuse the SET type OID?
Uh, why worry? If you had an application that depended in any way
shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...
regards, tom lane