Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 06/21/2012 06:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, I guess I've forgotten that one?
> See <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-01/msg00561.php>
I didn't understand that then, and I still don't. The ALTER TABLE
CLUSTER might need exclusive lock, but it's not going to hold the lock
long enough to be an issue. I could see that there's a problem with
identify_locking_dependencies believing that two CONSTRAINT items
conflict (do they really?) but not convinced the CLUSTER aspect has
anything to do with it.
regards, tom lane