Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess
Date
Msg-id 24615.1340322188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 06/21/2012 06:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, I guess I've forgotten that one?

> See <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-01/msg00561.php>

I didn't understand that then, and I still don't.  The ALTER TABLE
CLUSTER might need exclusive lock, but it's not going to hold the lock
long enough to be an issue.  I could see that there's a problem with
identify_locking_dependencies believing that two CONSTRAINT items
conflict (do they really?) but not convinced the CLUSTER aspect has
anything to do with it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] Add embedded list interface (header only)