Re: a couple questions about convert() - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: a couple questions about convert()
Date
Msg-id 24554.1411138212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to a couple questions about convert()  (smcg2297@frii.com)
Responses Re: a couple questions about convert()  (smcg2297@frii.com)
List pgsql-general
smcg2297@frii.com writes:
> In a postgresql-9.3.1 database with UTF8 encoding I can do:

>   select convert_from (E'\\x68656c6c6f', 'LATIN1');
>    convert_from
>   --------------
>    hello

> But when I explicitly give the "to" encoding:

>   select convert (E'\\x68656c6c6f', 'LATIN1', 'UTF8');
>      convert
>   --------------
>    \x68656c6c6f

> Why does that second one give different results from the first?

convert_from() produces a result of type text.  But convert() returns
bytea, because its output is not necessarily valid in the current
database encoding.  It's the same bytes, but it prints differently.
(You could ameliorate the unreadability by changing the bytea_output
setting.)

> Second question: why is that none of the convert* functions are
> marked as immutable (thus preventing me from creating a functional
> index using them).  Surely if I convert \x68 to utf-8 the result
> will *always* be "h", won't it?

Well, no, it'll be whatever the conversion function says it is;
and encoding conversion functions are replaceable through DDL.

I recall some discussion to the effect that that was silly and
we should rip out CREATE CONVERSION and friends in favor of
hard-wired conversion rules.  Nothing's been done about it though.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dev Kumkar
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_multixact issues
Next
From: Jan-Pieter Cornet
Date:
Subject: corruption in system tables (9.1.13)