Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta
Date
Msg-id 24504.1463237368@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> On 14 May 2016 at 10:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Using pg_get_indexdef() would leave you much less vulnerable to cross-
>> version differences in the system catalogs.

> That means parsing the response..

True.  If it seems like too much churn, I think you wouldn't go very far
wrong by assuming that ASC/DESC is only relevant to btree indexes.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta