Re: 8.1 observation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 8.1 observation
Date
Msg-id 24462.1125433610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 8.1 observation  (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> writes:
> I just noticed that pronargs in pg_proc does not show the full arg
> count, seems only to show count of IN args.
> shouldn't this show the full arg count including in/out/inout?

There was some discussion of that just a day or so ago; so far no one's
come up with a reasonable suggestion for what the output should look like.

> Also is it ok to talk about the 8.1 beta in this list?

Beta testing is generally considered off-topic for -general; try -hackers.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Cristian Prieto"
Date:
Subject: Help with SPI...
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: About "ERROR: must be *superuser* to COPY to or from