Re: Status of FDW pushdowns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Date
Msg-id 24426.1386188601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Status of FDW pushdowns  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> The downside of SQL-MED, particularly the way postgres implemented the
> driver API, is that each driver is responsible for for all
> optimization efforts and I think this is bad.

There was never any intention that that would be the final state of
things.  All the FDW APIs are quite experimental at this point, and
subject to change, and one of the reasons for change is going to be
to improve the optimization situation.

At the same time, it's hard to say what might constitute optimization
for FDWs that aren't backed by a remote SQL database.  There are always
going to be reasons why an FDW will have to do some of that work for
itself.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Templates S03E11