Re: max_parallel_workers can't actually be set? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: max_parallel_workers can't actually be set?
Date
Msg-id 24418.1566073424@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_parallel_workers can't actually be set?  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> writes:
>> which should certainly not happen for a PGC_POSTMASTER parameter.

> But max_parallel_workers is PGC_USERSET and this behavior seems be documented:

Argh!  I was looking at max_worker_processes in one window and
max_parallel_workers in another, and failed to see the discrepancy.

Those GUCs are too confusingly named :-(.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ibrar Ahmed
Date:
Subject: Re: max_parallel_workers can't actually be set?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: max_parallel_workers can't actually be set?