Re: Mail thread references in commits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Mail thread references in commits
Date
Msg-id 24413.1479575067@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mail thread references in commits  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Mail thread references in commits  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I wonder if now is the time (again) to consider an issue tracker.

That would make the problem at hand worse, not better, because you'd
get nothing at all for cases that were too trivial to make an issue
tracker entry for, or that the committer couldn't be bothered to go
find in the issue tracker.  We don't even have very widespread adherence
to the cite-a-message-thread convention yet (so far as I can tell,
Andres and I are the only committers doing it at all).  Adding another
step of bureaucracy to our processes is just going to fail miserably.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Mail thread references in commits
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: pg_dump -s -b