Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3
Date
Msg-id 24334.1487530091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Relevant question: what version of tcl is installed on those?

> 8.4.13 is installed.

Hmph.  I can't see any relevant-looking source changes between 8.4.13
and 8.4.15, which I have laying about here and which works fine.
I wonder if Red Hat is carrying some distro-specific patch that
breaks this case?  Or conceivably it's timezone dependent?

Anyway, my inclination is just to tweak that test a bit so it doesn't
trip over the problem.  The point of the test is mainly to see if the
[clock] command works at all, not to exercise any specific parameter
choices.  Would you check whether this:

$ tclsh
% clock format [clock scan "1/26/2010"] -format "%U"

gives the expected result "04" on that machine?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] drop support for Python 2.3