Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas F. O'Connell
Subject Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Date
Msg-id 2432ED1B-2F0F-4333-8022-7083EFCF5989@o.ptimized.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 6, 12:27 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> As per numerous reports this morning, PG 8.2.2 and 8.1.7 both fail on
> fairly simple scenarios involving typmod-bearing columns (varchar,
> numeric, etc) with check constraints or functional indexes (and maybe
> other cases too, but those are the ones reported so far).  I have not
> been able to reproduce the failures in 8.0 but I think it may have the
> same issue in a weaker form.  We need a quick re-release I'm afraid.

Should the existing source and binaries be pulled in the meantime?

--
Thomas F. O'Connell

optimizing modern web applications
: for search engines, for usability, and for performance :

615-260-0005

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto