Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 24238.1201881716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL  (Luke Porter <luke_porter@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Luke Porter <luke_porter@hotmail.com> writes:
> Is there an interest in developing bitemporal functionality in PostgreSQL

Is that anything like the late, mostly unlamented "time travel" feature?
        regards, tom lane

PS: in general, defining what you want with one word and assuming
everyone will grok the full meaning and implications of that is a good
way to get ignored on this list.  Assuming we have never heard of
"bitemporal" is a better starting point.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Luke Porter
Date:
Subject: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Greg Stark"
Date:
Subject: Re: Limit changes query plan