Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I would just fix it in head.
> That just seems weird. Either it's cheap enough not to matter (in
> which case there's no reason to revert that change at all) or it's
> expensive enough to matter (in which case presumably we don't want to
> leave it on in 9.1 for the 5 years or so it remains a supported
> release).
It needs to be reverted. I don't understand why you didn't do that
instantly upon the mistake being pointed out to you.
regards, tom lane
