> On Feb 24, 2026, at 23:09, zengman <zengman@halodbtech.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty() accepts an atttypid parameter that isn't actually used. The function
onlyneeds typtype to distinguish between range and multirange types.
> Currently lookup_type_cache() is called just to extract typtype, but I think using get_typtype() directly seems more
appropriate.
>
> ```
> static void ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(Relation rel, NameData attname, Datum attval,
> - char typtype, Oid atttypid);
> + char typtype);
>
> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------
> * ExecOpenIndices
> @@ -753,11 +754,10 @@ check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint(Relation heap, Relation index,
> {
> TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(heap);
> Form_pg_attribute att = TupleDescAttr(tupdesc, attno - 1);
> - TypeCacheEntry *typcache = lookup_type_cache(att->atttypid, 0);
>
> ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(heap, att->attname,
> values[indnkeyatts - 1],
> - typcache->typtype, att->atttypid);
> + get_typtype(att->atttypid));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ index_expression_changed_walker(Node *node, Bitmapset *allUpdatedCols)
> * range or multirange in the given attribute.
> */
> static void
> -ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(Relation rel, NameData attname, Datum attval, char typtype, Oid atttypid)
> +ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty(Relation rel, NameData attname, Datum attval, char typtype)
> {
> bool isempty;
> RangeType *r;
> ```
>
> --
> regards,
> Man Zeng<0001-refactor-Simplify-ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty-functi.patch>
Removing the parameter atttypid from ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty looks okay as it’s a static function and is only
calledonce.
For the other change, I see a difference between lookup_type_cache and get_typtype, where lookup_type_cache never
returnsNULL but ereport(ERROR) when oid is invalid; while get_typtype will return ‘\0'. Though
ExecWithoutOverlapsNotEmpty()will end up also elog(ERROR), the log message is changed.
I am not sure if there could be some edge cases where att->atttypid could be invalid. If yes, then this change will
leadto a small behavior change.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
