Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 7:58 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, but that was for a security hole. I am doubtful that the
>> severity of this problem is bad enough to justify jumping through
>> similar hoops. Even if we fixed it and documented it, how many
>> users would bother to apply the manual correction?
> Sure, only most conscious users will do the manual correction. But if
> there are only two option: backpatch it this way or don't backpatch at
> all, then I would choose the first one.
Well, if it were something that you could just do and forget, then
maybe. But actually, you are proposing to invest a lot of *other*
people's time --- notably me, as the likely author of the next
set of release notes --- so it's not entirely up to you.
Given the lack of field complaints, I'm still of the opinion that
this isn't really worth back-patching.
regards, tom lane
