Re: psql \d commands and information_schema - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql \d commands and information_schema
Date
Msg-id 24206.1239229793@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \d commands and information_schema  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane escribi?:
>>> BTW, I hesitate to mention this and perhaps upset a fragile consensus,
>>> but should we remove the special-case code in \df that tries to hide I/O
>>> functions by excluding functions that take or return cstring?  I think
>>> that its value has largely disappeared given the new overall behavior.
>> 
>> +1

> Agreed.

Done.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NaN support in NUMERIC data type
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC inconsistency in 8.4?