Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Marc G. Fournier<scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>> More often then when ppl commit? �What would be the point to that?
> Well, the whole point of using rsync is that it only copies what has
> changed, so there is very little overhead involved in running it when
> nothing has changed.
This is kind of missing the point, which is that we are talking about
blowing away lockfiles. Having that happen frequently and automatically
doesn't sound like a particularly good idea.
One thing I'm wondering is why cvs is taking out locks at all, since
it's certainly not committing to the repository. I guess even a "cvs
update" locks things momentarily, but can we prevent that?
regards, tom lane
