Re: BUG #5626: Parallel pg_restore fails with "tuple concurrently updated" - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #5626: Parallel pg_restore fails with "tuple concurrently updated"
Date
Msg-id 23980.1282328357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5626: Parallel pg_restore fails with "tuple concurrently updated"  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> We should probably try to make pg_restore smarter about this case,

> Yes, definitely.  I don't have an immediate solution though,

I just posted some further analysis to pgsql-hackers.  Please follow up
there.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5626: Parallel pg_restore fails with "tuple concurrently updated"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY FROM/TO losing a single byte of a multibyte UTF-8 sequence