Re: Feature Request: bzip2 support in pg_dump, pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Feature Request: bzip2 support in pg_dump, pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 23875.1281710850@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature Request: bzip2 support in pg_dump, pg_restore  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Daniel Migowski wrote:
>> A small investigation showed to me that bzip2 compressed sql files
>> take only 60% of the space of gz compressed files. Since bzip2 is
>> fairly common today, could one add an option to pg_dump and pg_restore
>> supporting this compression type in their custom format? Or do the
>> PostgreSQL folks prefer no to do that regarding backwards compatibility?

> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#Why_aren.27t_there_more_compression_options_when_dumping_tables.3F
> now has a first round answer to this topic, one that addresses the
> things that pop up every time this discussion is raised.  There are
> speed, code quality, code license, and patent issues all making this
> much harder to change than is obvious at first.

Looks good.  I added the point that pg_dump output has to be readable
far into the future, so conservatism in what we support is a good thing.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression on SSL links?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression on SSL links?