Re: JDBC int8 hack - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: JDBC int8 hack
Date
Msg-id 23852.989278636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC int8 hack  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: JDBC int8 hack
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this?  It appends :int8 to long constants in Java
> to fix our problem with not using int8 indexes with uncase long values.
> Is this fixed in 7.1, and therefore the patch isn't needed?

The problem is still there, but I think this proposed fix is entirely
inappropriate.  See prior thread.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC int8 hack
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC cleanup