Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
Date
Msg-id 23820.989278552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Sounds fine, but aren't most people who we ask for stats superusers?

Are they?  I don't think we should assume that.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: create database name with location = 'path';
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bug with pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?)