Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> If we wanted to stay consistent, then we should be renaming the constraint
> indexes whenever the table is renamed!
I thought about that, too, and I'd be in favor of it if it didn't have
problems of its own. (The big one being that if the new main-table
name is longer or shorter than the old, you would have to redo the
whole derived-name-generation process, or run into possible truncation
problems. So it leads to the same kind of loss of predictability I'm
griping about.)
regards, tom lane
