Re: LLVM / clang - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LLVM / clang
Date
Msg-id 2380.1278621587@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LLVM / clang  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> So, clang 2.7 didn't fix it.  Do we want to proceed with my patch or
> leave clang unsupported?

Given that the patch breaks plperl, I'd vote no ... but in any case
right now is not the time to be applying it.  Maybe it would be useful
to put it in HEAD after we branch 9.0.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: LLVM / clang
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock