Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits
Date
Msg-id 23777.1231178875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> So what do we want to do for 8.4?  Add 32/64-bit version() indicator and
> add OUT parameters to the TODO list?

+1.  There seems a good case for making the 32/64bit distinction
visible somewhere, and the text version string is as good as anyplace.

I think the business about splitting up the string is mostly
lily-gilding, but if someone wants it enough to do it ...
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)
Next
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)