Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
> FYI defaults have the same problem. Would it be awkward would it be
> to use pg_constraint for the book keeping as well? [ and by that I
> really mean ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT my_default DEFAULT .... so you
> can give them a name ]
That sounds moderately insane to me. Why would you need a name?
What would it mean to have more than one default attached to a column?
regards, tom lane
