> I think this should be a closed list run by the Linux Foundation.
Why's that? I'm willing to put up a list we can use for discussion.
> Because some members of the community have a conflict of interest, I'm
> not certain we can have a certification endorsed by "the whole community".
Depends on what you call "endorsed". Nobody expects us to say this is the one
and only.
> I would be willing to review the test questions (and suggest some), as
> well as reviewing overall coverage.
Ok, thanks. BTW we're not talking questions here, but tasks to be performed.
> However, the first question we should have with this is "what problem
> are we solving?"
>
> That is, are the EnterpriseDB/SRA/etc. certifications not good enough?
At the very least they are not vendor neutral.
> to make money off PostgreSQL. If there is a deficiency, we need to make
> sure that an LF certification will address that specific deficiency.
Again, by its very setup I think it solves the major problem.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
