Re: psql table comments? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql table comments?
Date
Msg-id 2370.1092850774@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to psql table comments?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: psql table comments?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I have just noticed that \d+ tablename doesn't show the table 
> comment/description - should it? Is this a TODO?

\dt+ tablename shows this, in what is probably a more convenient format
than \d+ would be able to use.  The \d printout is already awfully
cluttered, I don't think we want to add stuff to it unnecessarily.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.0 libpq: missing get_home_path()
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'