Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ?? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ??
Date
Msg-id 23663.1150986136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ??  ("Andy Shellam" <andy@andycc.net>)
Responses Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ??  ("Andy Shellam" <andy@andycc.net>)
List pgsql-admin
"Andy Shellam" <andy@andycc.net> writes:
>> Don't do this.  Postgres itself will remove the file after the
>> archive_command has copied it elsewhere.

> In my 8.1.3 install, it didn't - when I specified a cp command, it left the
> files there.  I had to define the command as "mv" to have them moved.

If it left the files there, it had a reason to (probably, that it wanted
to rename them for use as new WAL segments).  It is NOT NOT NOT the job
of the archive_command to do anything except copy the data somewhere else.

Back to the OP's problem: failure to recycle WAL segments requires some
active looking into, not mindless removal of files.  The only
explanations I can think of are that he's got the checkpoint interval
settings at wacko values, or more likely something is preventing
checkpoints from completing; if so, it's desperately important to find
out what and fix it.  Manual file removal is addressing a symptom not
the problem.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Andy Shellam"
Date:
Subject: Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ??
Next
From: "Andy Shellam"
Date:
Subject: Re: 2,2gb of pg_xlog ??