Re: Postgres perl module namespace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres perl module namespace
Date
Msg-id 2364418.1650305263@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres perl module namespace  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Postgres perl module namespace  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Postgres perl module namespace  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> No, I think we could probably just port the whole of src/test/PostreSQL
> back if required, and have it live alongside the old modules. Each TAP
> test is a separate miracle - see comments elsewhere about port
> assignment in parallel TAP tests.
> But that would mean we have some tests in the old flavor and some in the
> new flavor in the back branches, which might get confusing.

That works for back-patching entire new test scripts, but not for adding
some cases to an existing script, which I think is more common.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash