"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:43:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It would be nice to have some *evidence*, not unsupported handwaving.
> If someone has an idea on how to actually get that evidence, I'm all
> ears.
Well, for example, actually measuring the planner overhead from larger
pg_statistic entries would be interesting. Plus how much more time
ANALYZE takes to generate the entries. (I'm afraid that ANALYZE is
probably worse-than-linear CPU-wise, but it may be dominated by disk
access.)
regards, tom lane
