Since SpinLockAcquire() / SpinLockRelease() macros usually reference variables
declared as volatile, I wonder if the following changes should be applied.
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c
index 0e60dbc..256d09d 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c
@@ -195,11 +195,11 @@ shm_mq_set_receiver(shm_mq *mq, PGPROC *proc)
volatile shm_mq *vmq = mq;
PGPROC *sender;
- SpinLockAcquire(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockAcquire(&vmq->mq_mutex);
Assert(vmq->mq_receiver == NULL);
vmq->mq_receiver = proc;
sender = vmq->mq_sender;
- SpinLockRelease(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockRelease(&vmq->mq_mutex);
if (sender != NULL)
SetLatch(&sender->procLatch);
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@ shm_mq_set_sender(shm_mq *mq, PGPROC *proc)
volatile shm_mq *vmq = mq;
PGPROC *receiver;
- SpinLockAcquire(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockAcquire(&vmq->mq_mutex);
Assert(vmq->mq_sender == NULL);
vmq->mq_sender = proc;
receiver = vmq->mq_receiver;
- SpinLockRelease(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockRelease(&vmq->mq_mutex);
if (receiver != NULL)
SetLatch(&receiver->procLatch);
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ shm_mq_get_receiver(shm_mq *mq)
volatile shm_mq *vmq = mq;
PGPROC *receiver;
- SpinLockAcquire(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockAcquire(&vmq->mq_mutex);
receiver = vmq->mq_receiver;
- SpinLockRelease(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockRelease(&vmq->mq_mutex);
return receiver;
}
@@ -249,9 +249,9 @@ shm_mq_get_sender(shm_mq *mq)
volatile shm_mq *vmq = mq;
PGPROC *sender;
- SpinLockAcquire(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockAcquire(&vmq->mq_mutex);
sender = vmq->mq_sender;
- SpinLockRelease(&mq->mq_mutex);
+ SpinLockRelease(&vmq->mq_mutex);
return sender;
}