Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date
Msg-id 23582.1220964627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Agreed"?  That last restriction is a deal-breaker.

> OK, I should have said *if wal_buffers are full* XLogInsert() cannot
> advance to a new page while we are waiting to send or write. So I don't
> think its a deal breaker.

Oh, OK, that's obvious --- there's no place to put more data.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication