Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?
Date
Msg-id 23561.1488208238@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?  (Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin@gmail.com> writes:
> Here , Why postgresql takes different time when remote table and foreign
> table have different definition for timestamp column?

I believe postgres_fdw sets the timezone in its remote session to UTC
for predictability of results.  Your table definition is really at fault
for being dependent on what the session timezone is.

Personally I'd make the ins_ts column be timestamp with time zone, but
if you really don't want to do that, you could consider making the default
expression be "current_timestamp AT TIME ZONE 'something'" to force the
rotated value to be in a particular zone.

            regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14570: Validation error
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14543: libpq fails with group readable ssl keys