Re: v7.1b4 bad performance - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Date
Msg-id 23508.982374576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: v7.1b4 bad performance  ("Schmidt, Peter" <peter.schmidt@prismedia.com>)
List pgsql-admin
BTW, what -B setting were you running the postmaster with?  While poking
at this, I was reminded that having adequate buffer space really makes
a considerable difference ... especially under WAL, where it's not
necessary to flush dirty buffers to disk at the end of each transaction.
The default -B 64 is certainly too small to get reasonable performance.
I got roughly twice the tps reading (pgbench -t 1000, with -F) at -B 1024.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Next
From: "Schmidt, Peter"
Date:
Subject: RE: v7.1b4 bad performance