Re: Random number generation, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Random number generation, take two
Date
Msg-id 23507.1480987888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Random number generation, take two  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Random number generation, take two
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> Tom: I expect pademelon to fail at the configure step, complaining that
>> "no source of strong random numbers was found". Let's wait for one
>> cycle, to verify that it does fail like that. After that, can you add
>> the --disable-strong-random flag to fix it, please?

> Roger, I'll deal with that later today.

Results seem to be as expected:

http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2016%3A14%3A10

http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2022%3A19%3A42
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs