Re: Postgres with pthread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres with pthread
Date
Msg-id 23450.1512579201@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres with pthread  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Postgres with pthread
Re: Postgres with pthread
Re: Postgres with pthread
List pgsql-hackers
Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> Below are some results (1000xTPS) of select-only (-S) pgbench with scale
> 100 at my desktop with quad-core i7-4770 3.40GHz and 16Gb of RAM:

> Connections    Vanilla/default       Vanilla/prepared
> pthreads/defaultpthreads/prepared
> 10                    100 191                      
> 106                         207
> 100                  67 131                      
> 105                         168
> 1000                41 65                        
> 55                           102

This table is so mangled that I'm not very sure what it's saying.
Maybe you should have made it an attachment?

However, if I guess at which numbers are supposed to be what,
it looks like even the best case is barely a 50% speedup.
That would be worth pursuing if it were reasonably low-hanging
fruit, but converting PG to threads seems very far from being that.

I think you've done us a very substantial service by pursuing
this far enough to get some quantifiable performance results.
But now that we have some results in hand, I think we're best
off sticking with the architecture we've got.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Postgres with pthread
Next
From: Andrzej Barszcz
Date:
Subject: views