Re: A quick question on CONTRIB package - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A quick question on CONTRIB package
Date
Msg-id 23434.1149115748@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A quick question on CONTRIB package  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
> ramakrishna.reddy@indussoft.com ("Ramakrishna Reddy") writes:
>> We have very huge databases in many installations and infact have
>> plans for upgrading to latest releases. But as we are not very sure
>> about the stability of post 7.2.1 versions, refrained from doing
>> that. Could you please suggest me which version is the best in terms
>> of stability, performance and minimal bugs. We want to upgrade this
>> on both our Windows as well as Linux environments.

> Well, there are only three versions worth considering:
> ...
> It all seems to point to 8.1.4 being the best candidate.

I'm having a hard time not rolling on the floor laughing at this
discussion.  If 7.2.1 is your standard of comparison, any of the later
branches are super stable ...

A more serious point is that 7.2.x to 8.x is a big jump in terms of
behavior; there were a lot of not-so-compatible changes in between.
Porting their application code first to 7.4 and then to 8.1 might be a
good plan in terms of not dealing with too many things at once.
I don't suggest moving their production databases twice, just divvying
up the work of testing and updating their applications.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig White
Date:
Subject: importing data
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Lossy character conversion to Latin-1