Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy
Date
Msg-id 23412.1317838554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy  (Raghavendra <raghavendra.rao@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> It used to be that cluster on a very randomly ordered table was much
> slower than doing something like select * into newtable from oldtable
> order by col1, col2;  Is that still the case in 9.0/9.1?

Fixed in 9.1, per release notes:

    * Allow CLUSTER to sort the table rather than scanning the index when it seems likely to be cheaper (Leonardo
Francalanci)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: : Performance Improvement Strategy
Next
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Intel 710 Endurance Test Results