Re: No PUBLIC access by default? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: No PUBLIC access by default?
Date
Msg-id 23407.1123796685@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No PUBLIC access by default?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: No PUBLIC access by default?  (Peter Fein <pfein@pobox.com>)
List pgsql-general
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Actually, that last grant is implicit.  When an ACL is found to be null,
> it's considered to have a grant to public.

No, it's considered to be whatever the default for the object type is.
Read the GRANT manual page.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ed L."
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance riddle
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading 7.3.9 -> 7.4.8 - trouble with blobs