Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1
Date
Msg-id 2339.1130002723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> So postmaster doesn't clean up pg_listener,

It never has.  If you're complaining about this patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-10/msg00073.php
you ought to say so, rather than expecting us to guess it from an
out-of-context quote from another mailing list.

As near as I can tell, the technique Jan describes is an abuse of
pg_listener, and I won't feel any great sympathy when it does break
completely, which it will do before long when pg_listener goes away
in the planned rewrite of LISTEN/NOTIFY.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance