Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I see we have:
> CREATE index_opt_unique INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_name ...
> which explains how this error occurs.
Maybe to you, but I'm still caffeine-deprived and don't exactly see what
it was that Greg mistyped. AFAICS he'd have to type CONCURRENTLY twice
to get into a scenario where the proposed warning would fire.
> But might it not be better to have this instead?
> CREATE CONCURRENTLY index_opt_unique INDEX index_name ...
When I was fooling with gram.y I was thinking that actually
CREATE [UNIQUE] INDEX indexname [CONCURRENTLY] ...
would be the most grammatical thing. But I can live with putting
it right after CREATE, too. Or there was the proposal to put it
first:
[CONCURRENTLY] CREATE [UNIQUE] INDEX indexname ...
regards, tom lane
