Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled
Date
Msg-id 23243.1195159121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Tree view 
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Here's an updated version of the patch. There was a bogus assertion in
> the previous one, comparing against mdsync_cycle_ctr instead of
> mdunlink_cycle_ctr.

Applied with minor corrections.

I'm not sure whether we should consider back-patching this.  Thoughts?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: hashlittle(), hashbig(), hashword() and endianness
Next
From: Alex Vinokur
Date:
Subject: Re: hashlittle(), hashbig(), hashword() and endianness