Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Date
Msg-id 2321548.1703625666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
List pgsql-www
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:10:47PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> It may be better to just say "relational".

> I guess if I had to name this with no precedence, I would call it
> relational/extendable, but that seems even worse that what we have.

Call it an "extensible relational database"?  I agree that the
"object" part is out of date and no longer much of a focal point.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page