Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 5:34 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Which part exactly? There are several different changes proposed here.
> I was just going based on the description of the feature in your
> original post. If someone is hoping that int4in() will accept only
> ^\d+$ then they will be disappointed by this patch.
Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought this was about what you could
write as a SQL literal, not about the I/O behavior of the integer
types. I'd be -0.1 on changing the latter.
regards, tom lane
