Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)
Date
Msg-id 23108.1332945176@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm coming around to the point of view that we should just make
> pg_terminate_backend()'s behavior consistent with pg_cancel_backend()
> and call it good.

Yeah, the issues that are really of concern are not ones that that
function in itself can address.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_test_timing utility, to measure clock monotonicity and timing